For years, the prevailing belief in climate strategy has been that escalating natural disasters would compel governments, businesses, and individuals to take decisive climate action. However, atmospheric scientist Katharine Hayhoe contests this assumption, saying that using fear and urgency alone to drive change is ineffective. Instead, she emphasizes the need to empower people and organizations with clear, achievable actions that connect climate challenges to their everyday values and roles.

Hayhoe highlights Canada’s recent wildfire season as a case in point. Despite experiencing the worst wildfires on record, which affected the country coast to coast, the anticipated surge in climate-driven political will did not materialize. The election that followed saw the rise of a candidate advocating to eliminate the carbon tax rather than intensify climate policies. This outcome revealed how overwhelming disasters can lead to feelings of helplessness rather than motivation, as individuals struggle to see how their actions matter on such a large scale.

This touches on a core issue Hayhoe calls the “efficacy problem.” Behavior science shows that worry alone cannot move people or companies to act without a tangible belief that their efforts will make a difference. Climate communication often floods audiences with alarming data but fails to provide a clear, practical “next step.” This gap undermines action both on the ground and within corporate boardrooms.

According to Hayhoe, the challenge extends to organizational dynamics, where sustainability officers, CEOs, and boards frequently pass responsibility down the chain without consensus or meaningful progress. This creates a cycle of frustration and a sense of defeat when climate targets are missed, weakening leadership’s confidence that impactful climate action is achievable.

Rather than introducing more complex frameworks, Hayhoe advocates for a more grounded approach. She urges businesses to focus on internal education that relates climate issues directly to employees’ existing work and values. This approach should be coupled with genuine invitations for workers at all levels to contribute ideas and solutions. In doing so, companies can build a culture of collective responsibility and actionable hope, moving beyond doom-and-gloom narratives to foster real change.

Hayhoe’s communication model links three essential elements: understanding the facts (“head”), connecting emotionally through personal and communal values (“heart”), and providing straightforward, doable actions (“hands”). She believes that effective climate efforts depend on integrating all three.