Senator Elizabeth Warren has expressed fierce opposition to the CLARITY Act, a sweeping crypto market bill currently under debate in the Senate. She argues that as it stands, the legislation risks enabling sanctions evasion by providing broad exemptions to decentralized finance (DeFi) and lacking stringent anti-money laundering (AML) measures.

Her concerns resonate with those of Richard Nephew, a former U.S. National Security Council official specializing in Iran sanctions. Nephew criticized the bill for its relaxed regulatory approach, warning that recent Treasury efforts to freeze over $1 billion in Iranian cryptocurrency assets would be undermined by the CLARITY Act’s DeFi exemptions. He highlighted vulnerabilities that could be exploited by terrorists and other illicit actors, couched under the bill’s claim of technological neutrality.

Adding complexity to the debate, the banking lobby has also voiced opposition to the bill. Initially focused on risks associated with stablecoin yields, their objections have increasingly shifted toward concerns about illicit finance. Meanwhile, the White House downplayed Warren’s critique through its Chief Crypto Advisor, Patrick Witt, who made a pointed remark intended to question her credibility based on unrelated political controversies.

Despite these political exchanges, several Democrats remain cautious about supporting the bill without stronger ethics measures, given unresolved issues and past controversies involving crypto profits linked to former President Donald Trump. For the bill to pass, all Republicans and several Democrats would need to unite in favor, but some pro-crypto Democrats have pledged to withhold support if ethical standards are not met.

A notable exception is Section 604, which provides DeFi-related exemptions. This provision has backing from Senators Ron Wyden and Cynthia Lummis and aims to protect developers of non-custodial software while enabling the Department of Justice to target illicit actors. Law enforcement groups have recently shown support for this section following consultations.

Still, the shrinking Senate calendar has dimmed hopes for the bill’s approval, with odds of passage estimated to be under 50%. Industry insiders worry that failure to enact bipartisan crypto regulation before the congressional August recess could stall meaningful legislation until the next decade.