The Trump administration’s mass dismissal of the National Science Board, which advises the National Science Foundation (NSF), has sparked concern among Democratic lawmakers who warn this move could undermine America’s role as a global scientific leader. The entire board was removed shortly after issuing a report highlighting China’s rise in research and development spending, signaling a potential shift in the United States’ competitive edge.

Lawmakers Ro Khanna and Haley Stevens have formally requested answers from the NSF and the White House to clarify who authorized the unprecedented action and the reasoning behind it. Their letter emphasizes the timing of the dismissals, coming immediately after the board’s 2026 State of U.S. Science and Engineering Report was published—a report that documented China surpassing the U.S. in R&D expenditures for the first time. The lawmakers stressed that this disruption impedes the board’s ability to brief Congress or recommend policies needed to restore and sustain U.S. scientific leadership.

The National Science Board plays a crucial role in shaping science and technology priorities by providing independent oversight to the NSF, which funds a vast majority of federally supported research. Critics argue that the administration’s actions are part of a broader pattern aimed at weakening key research institutions and sidelining expert advice during a critical geopolitical moment. Former National Science Board members and leaders in higher education have voiced alarm, suggesting the dismissals diminish the integrity and stability of America’s scientific infrastructure.

Khanna and Stevens have requested detailed documentation covering the period from late April onward, seeking insight into the decision-making process behind the board’s removal. Their demands include the release of the NSF’s response to the R&D gap highlighted by the board’s report, as well as the publication of the accompanying policy brief that addressed U.S.-China scientific competition. They urge the administration to present a clear plan ensuring the NSF's continued ability to fulfill its mission and retain international standing in science and innovation.