Recent polls indicate a marked change in how Syrians and Lebanese perceive Hezbollah and prospects for peace with Israel. In both countries, a clear majority now rejects Hezbollah’s military role, viewing it as detrimental to national security. These developments illustrate evolving regional attitudes amid ongoing conflicts and political shifts.
In Syria, the results highlight that nearly seven out of ten respondents regard Hezbollah’s involvement as negative, with more than half considering it very harmful. Only a small fraction view Hezbollah positively. Alongside this, a majority of Syrians believe that peace with Israel is likely in the future, signaling a notable departure from previous public sentiment. Support for formal security arrangements between Syria’s new government and Israel also appears strong, suggesting a willingness to explore diplomatic solutions despite past hostilities.
Meanwhile, Lebanese respondents also show increasing dissatisfaction with Hezbollah’s armed presence. A majority consider its impact on Lebanon’s security unfavorable, although a significant portion remains uncertain. For the first time in ongoing surveys, more Lebanese citizens favor engagement with Israel than oppose it. Support rises for President Joseph Aoun’s initiatives to bolster the Lebanese Army and impose government control over all armed forces, including the disarmament of Hezbollah militias.
These polls were conducted by the Council for a Secure America and come amid broader geopolitical developments involving US-Iran relations. The findings suggest shifting public priorities in Syria and Lebanon, with potential implications for regional stability and diplomacy. The growing backing for peace talks and state sovereignty reflect an undercurrent of change that contrasts starkly with long-standing alliances and conflicts.