The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) has entered a new phase following its mandatory six-year review, transitioning to automatic annual renewals set to continue through 2036. This shift comes as all three nations opted not to withdraw from the pact but left longstanding calls for substantial reforms unanswered.

Originally negotiated during Donald Trump’s first presidential term as a successor to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), USMCA promised to enhance trade relations and protect domestic industries. Despite these intentions, the U.S. trade deficit with its North American partners has grown, and manufacturing job losses have persisted under the agreement.

Environmental advocates, including Sierra Club and allied climate organizations, have voiced strong concerns over the treaty’s current environmental protections. They argue that the agreement lacks robust mechanisms to penalize factories that violate pollution standards, creating an uneven playing field where environmentally negligent companies can economically outcompete responsible producers. This dynamic not only harms local ecosystems but also contributes to cross-border pollution and global climate emissions.

In response to such concerns, hundreds of lawmakers from both the House and Senate have urged the U.S. Trade Representative to leverage the review period to enhance U.S. competitiveness through enforceable environmental safeguards and labor protections. A resolution introduced by Representative Rosa DeLauro aims to align trade policy with goals of strengthening domestic manufacturing, securing family-supporting jobs, and reducing pollution domestically and internationally. The Sierra Club publicly supports this initiative, underscoring the need for fundamental revisions.

The Deputy Director of Sierra Club’s Industrial Transformation Campaign emphasized the unsustainability of the current agreement. She called for a reconfiguration of the USMCA that nurtures a resilient and competitive manufacturing sector benefiting workers, communities, and the environment alike. Without meaningful reform, continuing the agreement on its current terms risks perpetuating offshoring trends and environmental degradation.

This new annual review process effectively keeps the USMCA flexible, allowing member countries to revisit and potentially amend provisions to respond to evolving economic and environmental priorities over the next decade and beyond.